Contents
- 1 Everest Business Funding Ripoff Report
- 2 The Rise of Everest Business Funding
- 3 Common Complaints Against Everest Business Funding
- 4 Legal and Ethical Considerations
- 5 Conclusion:
- 6 Faqs
- 6.1 What is a Merchant Cash Advance?
- 6.2 Why do businessmen go for MCAs as opposed to regular loans?
- 6.3 On what basis have most of the complaints filed against Everest Business Funding been found?
- 6.4 If you found our content helpful don’t forget to share it on your social media: Twitter
- 6.5 More Articles: Home
Everest Business Funding Ripoff Report
Everest Business Funding is the most sought-after alternative source of funding, especially when dealing with the smallest of businesses that banks reject for financing. It was established with the mission of quickly and flexibly availing fundraising alternatives to all types of businesses in need of accessible capital. The very terminology “ripoff report” ushering in Everest Business Funding indicates a high level of criticism surrounding the company and clients’ adverse feedback. In this post, we will delve a bit deeper to see exactly what these complaints are all about and what the company is up to. We will guide your business on how to avoid these pitfalls that emanate from seeking funding.
The Rise of Everest Business Funding
Everest Business Funding came into existence to offer working capital to small and medium-scale organizations for proper growth and improvisation. The funding is delivered instantaneously upon the inking of the deal through a merchant cash advance financing, which means a business sells part of its future credit card sales so that it achieves immediate cash in return. MCAs do not require collateral and credit history, and therefore they are especially suitable for those businesses that, due to one reason or another, find it hard to raise money through traditional channels.
The low complexity and speed involved are what attracts one to MCAs. Many businesses can become funded in a matter of a few days, which is exceedingly important to a business with pressing monetary needs. It is also how the repayment house is pegged daily to the credit card transactions of the business. The more money that the business makes, the greater the payment will be. This kind of repayment plan is much more flexible since it changes by revenues. This, however, is a very expensive affair and in case the business is not generating an ample amount of income then it can be a major drain on the pocket.
Common Complaints Against Everest Business Funding
Despite the many benefits associated with MCAs, Everest Business Funding has been at the center of hundreds of complaints by clients who feel ripped off or scammed. Major critical issues normally revolve around high costs accompanied by hidden fees.
The most common complaint would be the outrageous pricing of credit. There have been reports by customers that at times ridiculously high effective APRs prevail on their loans, at times running into triple digits. This can be hard for a business to keep pace with the payments, which are then likely to spiral into debt.
Moreover, many of the consumers had complaints that they were not correctly informed about the fees and costs involved in availing of their loans. Lack of clarity or transparency in terms and conditions can prove to be an unwarranted extra pressure on finances.
Legal and Ethical Considerations
The nature of MCAs, as well as the business practices of companies like Everest Business Funding, often fall into this gray area of financial regulation. Truly, merchant cash advances are not loans; hence, they do not fall under the same regulations as standardized lending. The result of no legislation might therefore be that some companies get caught in predatory practices—that some of these companies would unscrupulously take advantage of such unregulated no-man’s land to use unfavorable terms against unsuspecting businesses.
Other ripoff reports also raised concerns regarding the clarity of the terms and conditions. Business owners reported being unaware of the actual cost of an advance, including fees and interest, before the agreement. In most instances, this can lead to businesses signing these agreements to their detriment, trapping them in cycles of debt.
Furthermore, some ethical concerns have been raised with the aggressive collection practices reported by some clients. While it is understandable that the company would want to recover its money, it ought to be through procedures that are reasonable and respectful. Stress from aggressive collections affects the health and well-being of business owners and hence their ability to run effective businesses.
Protecting Your Business from Predatory Practices
Since potential pitfalls are associated with merchant cash advances, businesses should be very careful while taking such funding options. Here are some steps for protecting your business and ensuring that you are clear about the decisions to be made when availing of financing
Keep Your Business Safe: A business should always be more careful while resorting to such funding in the face of the pitfalls that lie ahead in a merchant cash advance. Here are ways to save your business from falling into a financial trap:
Research the lenders: Apply this Rule to every type of funding that one ends up taking. Check for testimonials, reviews by other businesses or if complaints against the company were ever lodged to any consumer protection agency, for example the Better Business Bureau.
Know the terms of a deal: what exactly the total cost of borrowing will be, how it’s structured for repayment, and all aligned fees. Have them explain in simple terms how the effective APR is derived and benchmark against other available funding options.
Consult a financial advisor: If you get confused with the terminologies or if you believe an MCA is not the right choice for your business, then consult a financial advisor or a trusted accountant. They will help in making you understand by giving an unbiased assessment, including what the implications are going to be in the long run when availing of the funding.
Consider the cash flow: and whether your business can pay back daily. This would not be too good for such businesses whose revenues are seasonal or largely fluctuated, as this is going to strain them with the need to repay daily.
Discuss Alternatives: Other financing solutions exist in traditional loans and lines of credit. While all those have pros and cons, some are beneficial in comparison to others—not to mention more favorable terms when compared to an MCA.
Conclusion:
On one hand, Everest Business Funding helps many businesses retain their activity by supplying quick capital. Still, with these high costs and very aggressive repayment structures, possibly misleading terms generate many complaints and ripoff reports. Investigations may find that what might be a saving grace of MCAs for one firm could prove to be an absolute financial trap for some. Anyway, the entrepreneur should be founded on working on homework. Making sure all the words are clear to him. Indeed, other financing channels before involving in MCA should be taken into consideration. Precaution that allows the business to make viable decisions on its financial health and stability in the long term.
Faqs
What is a Merchant Cash Advance?
A merchant cash advance is the selling of part of future credit card sales to raise instant cash for a business. The major source of repaying this loan for the borrowing business originates daily from deductions from credit card sales.
Why do businessmen go for MCAs as opposed to regular loans?
Due to the connotations of less rigorous approval requirements and quicker access to capital than loans, MCAs become very frequently chosen. In this lies their charm for businesses that wouldn’t have otherwise qualified for traditional financing.
On what basis have most of the complaints filed against Everest Business Funding been found?
What were some key complaints? A: The key complaints were very high costs of borrowing and a too-aggressive, too-rigid structure of repayment. Other clients showed their concern towards transparency around terms and the total cost of the advance.